Trials, partial … be careful for this AI, which traps (amongst different issues) fraudsters

The New York Times reports on the story of a black student at a public university in Florida who claims to be “Algorithm falsely accused of academic dishonesty” – after a distance test in which AI (and a group of people) judged that she was cheating. With the pandemic and the development of distance learning, several American startups have launched solutions to combat test fraud. A very complicated problem that needs to be solved remotely.

For example, once the exam takes place at home, it is possible to hide course notes out of reach of the webcam, which cannot be done during face-to-face exams. One of these startups is called Honorlock, and it is she who is partly responsible for the accusation against the student. However, we can mention other names like ExamSoft, ProctorU and Proctorio. To pass the Honorlock exam, you must first and foremost respect the set of rules.

Identifying cheating with AI … a fake good idea?

Above all, you must sit in the room alone, do not eat or drink, use your phone, make sure you are alone throughout the test, do not look away from the screen and read notes. The student then had to pose in front of her computer’s webcam to take a selfie with a student ID card. Then pan the room using a computer webcam to prove to Honorlock and his teachers that nothing in the room is likely to support cheating.

So far, everything went well for the student, who at the time felt that she had passed the exam. However, a few days later, he receives an email from his teacher: “Honorlock reported you. After watching your video, we saw you repeatedly looking down and off the screen before answering the questions. ” All with 50-second video support … and a zero test score.

And email to add: “If you appear to be responsible for academic dishonesty, a grade of zero will be retained.”. The student would then tell her teacher (whom she had never physically met) that he “It must be a mistake.” […] I have not shown academic dishonesty. Looking down does not mean academic dishonesty. ” The New York Times, which was able to view the entire record of the investigation, explains that the controversial moment occurs about 1 minute after the start.

We see her reading questions and lowering her eyes each time, including one occurrence of about ten seconds – she doesn’t answer any questions during this time. However, this video alone does not allow us to close anything. The student also later told her teacher that she behaved this way when she thought – but that she did not cheat in any way. However, the professor decided to declare her “responsible” and kept the grade zero, while adding a mention to her academic file.

There is undoubtedly some confidence in the Honorlock tool. This is despite the fact that the latter only pointed out that the student was watching from the screen. These types of decisions, identified by AI and subsequently verified by human stakeholders, raise many questions, which have been summarized very well by Cooper Quintin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, quoted in the daily: “Who has their eyes fixed on the test 100% of the time? It’s ridiculous, people don’t work that way. “triggers this ombudsman.

Read also – Job interview: the video pushes many candidates to cheat with this method

And add “Normal behavior is punishable by this software.” He states that cases like this are on the rise as AI goes bankrupt: “Schools seem to see the diagnosis of AI as a gospel. If the computer says you are cheating, you are cheating. ”

Leave a Comment